RESUMO
Context: Liquid-based cytology. Aims: Utility of liquid-based cytology (LBC) was compared to conventional smear cytology in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates of abdominal masses. Settings and Design: This was a prospective comparative study conducted in collaboration with surgery and pediatrics surgery departments of our institute. Subjects and Methods: Thirty patients presenting with evidence of abdominal mass were enrolled for the study and underwent fine-needle aspiration cytology. The material was processed for the preparation of conventional smears and residual material was rinsed into cytolyt for LBC by Thin Prep method and into cell block fluid. The smears prepared from both the methods were compared by two independent and experienced pathologists for adequacy, cellularity, architectural pattern, cytoplasmic preservation, nuclear preservation, and background. Results: Cellularity was frequently higher in the conventional smears than on Thin Prep slides (P value = 0.025). Recognition of architecture was better on the conventional smears (P value = 0.001). Cytoplasm was better preserved on the conventional smears (P value = 0.001) but difference in the preservation of nuclear details was not statistically significant on slides prepared from both the techniques. The background of Thin Prep slides is significantly cleaner than direct smears (P value = 0.001). Non epithelial elements such as mucin and neurofibrillary tangles were better preserved on direct smears (P value = 0.001) but diagnostic accuracy of both the methodologies showed no statistically significant difference (P value = 0.226). Conclusions: The Thin Prep technique utilizes expensive equipment and reagents. It also generates certain morphological artefacts in slides with which a cytologist needs to get familiar. When used in isolation, it may not consistently provide any added advantage in the diagnosis of such lesions and should be used as an adjunct to conventional smears. It may be preferred in situations where material has to be transported for processing or is required for ancillary tests.
RESUMO
Background: Chronic liver disease (CLD) is defined as a process of slow and continuous destruction and regeneration of the hepatic parenchyma giving rise to fibrosis and cirrhosis. When it has markedly progressed, it may present with clinical bleeding due to reduction in levels of procoagulant factors, barring some like factor VIII and von Willebrand factor, which are elevated. It is essential to observe that reduced levels of the procoagulants are accompanied by decrease in levels of anticoagulants such as antithrombin and protein C. Under normal conditions, the coagulation machinery is balanced, but the phenomenon of the simultaneous reduction of procoagulants as well as anticoagulants in patients with CLD has been an unsolved puzzle since long. Objective: This study was undertaken to study the relevance and significance of first-line coagulation tests (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) in relation to bleeding manifestations in patients with CLD, to classify the cases of CLD enrolled on the basis of etiology, to study the platelet count, PT, and aPTT values of the cases, and to calculate the Child–Pugh (CP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores for all the patients and stratify them accordingly. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective observational study including 40 patients known to be diagnosed with CLD. CP score and MELD were calculated for all. Values of coagulation parameters were compared in patients with and without cirrhosis, in patients belonging to different CP classes, those with low and high MELD scores, and patients with or without upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed. Results: Means of PT and aPTT were compared in patients with and without cirrhosis where it was found that there was no statistically significant prolongation of PT or aPTT in patients with cirrhosis compared to those without. We also studied the values of PT and aPTT through increasing grades of CP score and found statistically significant difference between values of PT between those belonging to Class A versus Class C. It was observed that the difference of the mean of PT of the two groups (with MELD <15 and above 15) is statistically significant, whereas it is not true in case of aPTT. Conclusions: The study showed no significant alterations overall in patients with CLD except those in advanced CP classes and those with high MELD scores. They were not significant in patients presenting with UGI bleed, a common manifestation in cirrhotic patients, although those constituted a very small part of the study group. These indices alone are insufficient to include as part of their prognostic and clinical work up to predict bleeding.